Published: 2026/11/08

Updated: 2026/11/06

Author: Nadia Winchester

PAGCOR E-Gaming Revenue Falls 37% in Nine Months

PAGCOR’s January to September 2026 results show online gaming revenue down 37.23% to PHP27.63 billion, while licensed casinos fell just 3.22%. The split points back to the August 2025 order that stripped gambling links out of GCash and Maya, one year after online play took more than half of the Philippine market for the first time.
PAGCOR e-gaming revenue

The Philippines spent 2025 watching online play overtake its casino floors for the first time in the country’s history. One year on, PAGCOR e-gaming revenue has fallen by more than a third, and the regulator’s nine-month figures put hard numbers on how quickly that reversal arrived. Revenue from the segment dropped to PHP27.63 billion between January and September, down from PHP44.03 billion. Licensed casinos, operating in the same economy across the same nine months, lost barely 3%.

Where the Nine-Month Figures Landed

PAGCOR recorded a 37.23% year-on-year decline in e-gaming revenue for the first three quarters of 2026, which works out to roughly PHP16.4 billion of lost ground. Total revenue across the regulator’s portfolio reached PHP64.41 billion for the same period, a fall of 23.41%. Within that total, PAGCOR e-gaming revenue carried almost all of the damage.

The first half of the year had already pointed this way. Revenue from e-games, e-bingo and bingo grantees came in at PHP18.6 billion for January through June, down 41.85% from PHP32 billion a year earlier. Three additional months of trading have softened the rate of decline a little without changing its shape.

The E-Wallet Order That Closed a Route

In August 2025, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas instructed supervised payment providers to strip out in-app links that sent users directly to gambling sites. GCash and Maya removed theirs on 16 August. Neither wallet stopped processing payments to gambling platforms, but the shortcut from a stored balance to a betting lobby vanished overnight.

That shortcut mattered more than its size suggests. GCash alone counted 81 million active users at the start of 2025, in a country where digital wallets handle a large slice of everyday spending. Chairman Alejandro Tengco has since tied the change to a softer third quarter, and the shape of PAGCOR e-gaming revenue through 2026 backs him up.

Casino Floors Held While Online Sank

Licensed casinos recorded a 3.22% dip over the same nine months, a rounding error beside the collapse in PAGCOR e-gaming revenue. Filipino players have not walked away from gambling. They kept arriving at venues at close to last year’s rate while the digital channel lost more than a third of its value.

A broad squeeze on household budgets would pull both channels down together. Instead the gap between them widened to roughly 34 percentage points, and that gap is difficult to explain through spending power alone. Tengco has also pointed to Middle East tensions and their drag on consumer wallets, which is a real pressure but not one that discriminates between a casino floor and a phone screen.

How Far PAGCOR E-Gaming Revenue Has Fallen From the Peak

Last year set a record that now reads very differently. Philippine gambling revenue hit PHP396.14 billion across the industry, with online play contributing PHP201.12 billion and taking 50.77% of total gross gaming revenue. That crossing point, where digital finally outearned licensed casinos, looked at the time like the opening of a long trend rather than a summit.

Measured against that peak, the fall in PAGCOR e-gaming revenue raises a structural question instead of a cyclical one. A segment that grows past half the national market in one year and sheds a third of its revenue the next was never as settled as the milestone implied. Growth that leaned on one convenient payment route proved fragile.

Two Explanations, No Breakdown

Tengco has named both the wallet order and weaker consumer spending, and nobody has yet sized either one. That leaves the recovery path for PAGCOR e-gaming revenue genuinely unclear, because the two causes point to very different futures. The distinction carries real commercial weight for every licensed operator in the market.

If players simply stopped, demand has evaporated and no amount of marketing brings it back on a short timeline. If they migrated to bank transfers, cards or unlicensed sites that never lost their wallet integrations, then the money still exists and the regulated market has handed share to someone else. Nothing in the nine-month data separates the two, and PAGCOR has published no breakdown.

The Floor Is Not in Sight Yet

Three consecutive reporting periods now point the same direction, so the slide in PAGCOR e-gaming revenue has moved well past the territory of one soft quarter. The rate of decline did ease between the half-year and nine-month marks, which offers thin comfort at best. A smaller fall remains a fall.

Fourth-quarter figures will arrive with a full year of post-order trading behind them. At that point the August 2025 comparison drops out of the year-on-year maths, and the market finally gets a clean view of itself without that distortion. For now, the Philippine online sector is working through an expensive lesson about how fast a single payment rule can rewrite a growth story.

Nadia Content Expert

The Author

Nadia Content Expert

The Author

Nadia Winchester

Slots and News Reviewer

Nadia Winchester has worked in the gambling industry since 2018 and covers slots and industry news for CasinoDaddy. She plays every slot she writes about rather than summarising a provider's fact sheet: how the volatility actually feels over a session, how often the bonus round lands in practice, and whether the published RTP matches what the provider states. She is responsible for the site's slot reviews and free demo play section, writes the daily industry news, and builds and maintains many of the site's larger guide pages.

related news